$\texttt{WEAVER}$, Better, Faster, Longer: An Effective World Model for Robotic Manipulation

Engineering notes

Engineering notes will be added by the Robot Papers editorial team.

Chinese explanation / 中文解读

中文解读待补充：本站会优先为 VLA、具身智能、人形机器人控制、机器人操作等高价值论文补充中文说明。

Original abstract

The potential impacts of world models (WMs, i.e., learned simulators) on robotics are far-reaching -- policy evaluation, policy improvement, and test-time planning -- all with limited real-world interaction. To unlock these downstream capabilities, a WM needs to jointly satisfy three desiderata: $\textit{(i)}$ fidelity (i.e., producing simulated trajectories that correlate with reality), $\textit{(ii)}$ consistency (i.e., producing simulated trajectories that are coherent over long horizons), and $\textit{(iii)}$ efficiency (i.e., producing simulated trajectories quickly). We propose $\texttt{WEAVER}$ (World Estimation Across Views for Embodied Reasoning): a WM architecture that simultaneously achieves all three desiderata, providing state-of-the-art results on robotic manipulation tasks. $\texttt{WEAVER}$ is a multi-view WM trained to predict future latents and reward values via a flow-matching loss. We distill the key design decisions across model architecture, memory, and prediction objectives required to unlock the kinds of long-horizon dynamic manipulation tasks that have confounded prior world modeling approaches. We apply $\texttt{WEAVER}$ in robotic hardware, demonstrating its effectiveness at policy evaluation ($ρ$=0.870 correlation with real-world success rate), policy improvement (real-world success rate improvement of $38\%$ on top of the $π_{0.5}$ robot foundation model), and test-time planning (real-world success rate improvement of $14\%$ with a $5-10\times$ speedup over prior WMs). $\texttt{WEAVER}$ also demonstrates better performance than prior WMs when evaluated on out-of-distribution scenarios. Code, models, and videos at: https://arnavkj1995.github.io/WEAVER/ .

Links and sources

• Official / arXiv page
• PDF from original source

Comments